Skip to content

Explicitly specify enum type scope to improve Java wrapper generation #3927

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 4.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

utibenkei
Copy link
Contributor

Changed PatternPositionType to aruco::PatternPositionType to explicitly specify its scope. This allows gen_java.py to correctly register disc_type, preventing constructors and methods using this enum type from being skipped during Java wrapper generation.

Related issues
#3506
opencv/opencv#23753

Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
  • The PR is proposed to the proper branch
  • There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
  • There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
    Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
  • The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake

Changed PatternPositionType to aruco::PatternPositionType to explicitly specify its scope.
This allows gen_java.py to correctly register disc_type, preventing constructors and
methods using this enum type from being skipped during Java wrapper generation.
@utibenkei utibenkei force-pushed the fix_java_enum_wrapper branch from d789d35 to 21b8361 Compare April 18, 2025 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants