Support for remote puppetdb#41
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you not increment this? A release increment is decided at release time, its not tied to a particular patch. The next release may be 1.2.0 for example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So, does it mean that 1.2.0 a good target version for me now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just leave it as it was '1.1.5'. The future version should be determined in a release patch not in a particular feature patch like this one.
|
Thanks for your comments, I've been working on fixing the issues. |
|
@fhrbek cheers - added some more comments to your comments :-). |
|
CLA Signed by fhrbek on 2013-01-07 21:00:00 -0800 |
|
I added an rpec test (is it what you meant?) and I also removed the option (that I had introduced) of reading the puppetdb.conf file which is not needed any more after changing the pe_puppetdb module. It would be great if we could finally merge this PR and #37. |
|
@fhrbek. This will need to be rebased as well |
|
I've rebased. We've both added spec tests. They don't seem to be in conflict but most of yours fail on my machine, for example Am I doing anything wrong? |
|
@fhrbek are you running 'rake spec' to run the tests? |
This PR contains changes that were required to handle connection validation in a more flexible way. The new solution also allows (on demand, not by default) to store configuration settings even when puppetdb is not reachable.