Skip to content

Turn on EXECUTORCH_BUILD_PYBIND when implicitly wanted #9611

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

jathu
Copy link
Contributor

@jathu jathu commented Mar 25, 2025

Summary

We want EXECUTORCH_BUILD_PYBIND enabled if the user wants to build the bindings — so let's just do it. Unless of course, they explicitly choose not to by defining the arg themselves.

Test plan

CI

cc @larryliu0820 @lucylq

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 25, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9611

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit 149e5bc with merge base 610f398 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 25, 2025
@jathu jathu force-pushed the jathu/no-redefine-pybind branch from c70d3fe to 2327924 Compare March 25, 2025 23:07
@jathu jathu added ciflow/trunk ciflow/binaries/all Release PRs with this label will build wheels for all python versions labels Mar 25, 2025
@jathu jathu force-pushed the jathu/no-redefine-pybind branch from 2327924 to d5ee210 Compare March 25, 2025 23:11
@jathu jathu force-pushed the jathu/no-redefine-pybind branch from d5ee210 to 149e5bc Compare March 25, 2025 23:12
@jathu jathu added module: build/install Issues related to the cmake and buck2 builds, and to installing ExecuTorch topic: not user facing labels Mar 25, 2025
@jathu jathu marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2025 23:15
@jathu jathu merged commit 0342bab into main Mar 26, 2025
164 of 167 checks passed
@jathu jathu deleted the jathu/no-redefine-pybind branch March 26, 2025 01:18
@jathu jathu mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2025
jathu added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
### Summary
After #9583 and
#9611, we don't rely on
environment variables to turn on pybindings.

### Test plan

Read + run example commands.
kirklandsign pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
### Summary

We want `EXECUTORCH_BUILD_PYBIND` enabled if the user wants to build the
bindings — so let's just do it. Unless of course, they explicitly choose
not to by defining the arg themselves.

### Test plan

CI


cc @larryliu0820 @lucylq
kirklandsign pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
### Summary
After #9583 and
#9611, we don't rely on
environment variables to turn on pybindings.

### Test plan

Read + run example commands.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/binaries/all Release PRs with this label will build wheels for all python versions ciflow/trunk CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. module: build/install Issues related to the cmake and buck2 builds, and to installing ExecuTorch topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants