[FEATURE] implement custom exceptions 157 #169
Conversation
New file tests/exceptions.py: - initial implementation of `CommandExecutionError`
…157 -) ### ChangeLog: Changes in file tests/exceptions.py: Unknown Changes
Changes in file tests/context.py: - checkPythonFuzzing -- now throws CommandExecutionError with exit code.
Changes in file tests/context.py: - added imports
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to error handling in the multicast module by implementing a custom exception, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)
📓 Learnings (2)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
Python Lang
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/exceptions.py (4)
1-1: Replace the header placeholder with an appropriate file header.The current header is just a placeholder. Consider adding a proper file header that includes copyright information, a brief description of the file's purpose, and any relevant license information.
3-3: Consider using a more explicit module declaration.While the current module declaration is correct, it could be made more explicit for better readability. Consider using the following format:
__module__ = "tests.exceptions"This change aligns with PEP 8 style guidelines for module-level dunder names.
5-27: Enhance the class docstring for better clarity and completeness.The current docstring is well-structured, but consider the following improvements:
- Add a brief explanation of when this exception should be raised.
- Include information about the inheritance from
RuntimeError.- Use consistent formatting for attribute descriptions.
- Consider adding a "Raises" section to document any exceptions that might be raised during instantiation.
- Use more descriptive labels for the meta-testing examples.
Here's a suggested revision:
class CommandExecutionError(RuntimeError): """ Exception raised when a command execution fails. This exception should be used to represent errors that occur during the execution of external commands or system calls. It inherits from RuntimeError and adds an exit_code attribute to provide more context about the failure. Attributes: message (str): Description of the error. exit_code (int): The exit code associated with the error. Raises: TypeError: If exit_code is not an integer. Examples: >>> error = CommandExecutionError("Failed to execute command", exit_code=1) >>> isinstance(error, RuntimeError) True >>> error.message 'Failed to execute command' >>> error.exit_code 1 """This revision provides more context about the exception's purpose and usage, while maintaining the existing meta-testing examples.
1-54: Consider adding a__all__declaration to define the public API.To explicitly define the public API of this module and control what gets imported when using
from tests.exceptions import *, consider adding an__all__declaration at the top of the file:__all__ = ['CommandExecutionError']This addition helps maintain a clean namespace and clearly communicates the intended public interface of the module.
tests/context.py (2)
598-607: LGTM: Improved error handling with CommandExecutionError.The changes to the
checkPythonFuzzingfunction effectively implement the custom exception handling as per the PR objectives. The use ofCommandExecutionErrorprovides more specific error information, which is a good improvement.Consider defining constants for the exit codes (66 and 2) to improve readability and maintainability. For example:
NO_ARGS_EXIT_CODE = 66 EXECUTION_ERROR_EXIT_CODE = 2 # Then use these constants in the function raise CommandExecutionError(str(_exc_msg), exit_code=NO_ARGS_EXIT_CODE) # ... raise CommandExecutionError(str(err), exit_code=EXECUTION_ERROR_EXIT_CODE) from errThis change would make the code more self-documenting and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1-924: Consider refactoring for improved file organization.The file
tests/context.pycontains a mix of utility functions and a test suite class, which is functional but could potentially be reorganized for better clarity and maintainability. Consider splitting this file into separate modules:
- A module for utility functions (e.g.,
test_utils.py)- A module for the
BasicUsageTestSuiteclass (e.g.,base_test_suite.py)- Keep
context.pyas an entry point that imports and exposes necessary componentsThis refactoring would improve the overall organization of the testing framework and make it easier to maintain and extend in the future. It would also align with the single responsibility principle, making each module more focused on a specific set of related functionalities.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/context.py (2 hunks)
- tests/exceptions.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/context.py (2)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
tests/exceptions.py (2)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/context.py (1)
136-143: LGTM: New import for CommandExecutionError.The addition of the CommandExecutionError import is well-implemented. It follows best practices by using a specific import and includes appropriate error handling. This change aligns with the PR objectives of implementing custom exceptions.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #169 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 98.023% 98.133% +0.111%
=============================================
Files 6 7 +1
Lines 354 375 +21
Branches 21 21
=============================================
+ Hits 347 368 +21
Misses 3 3
Partials 4 4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
…-) Changes in file multicast/__init__.py: - import and re-export multicast.exceptions New file multicast/exceptions.py: - replaces tests/exceptions.py - implements new exit-code features Changes in file tests/check_spelling: - updated format for github anotations Changes in file tests/context.py: - handle change to exception imports Removed file tests/exceptions.py: - replaced by multicast/exceptions.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/check_spelling (3)
159-170: Approve newreport_summaryfunction with a minor suggestionThe new
report_summaryfunction greatly improves error reporting and aligns well with the PR objectives. It provides clear, context-specific error messages and uses GitHub Actions workflow commands for better CI output formatting.For consistency, consider using
${SCRIPT_FILE}instead of${SCRIPT_FILE:-0}in the error messages, as the variable is always set. For example:- 1) printf "::error file=${SCRIPT_FILE},line=${BASH_LINENO:-0},title=CHECK-SPELLING::%s\n" "FAIL: General failure during script execution." >&2 ;; + 1) printf "::error file=${SCRIPT_FILE},line=${BASH_LINENO},title=CHECK-SPELLING::%s\n" "FAIL: General failure during script execution." >&2 ;;Apply this change to all similar lines in the function for consistency.
180-182: Approve debug and error messages with a minor suggestionThe addition of debug and error messages improves the script's observability and error reporting, which aligns well with the PR objectives.
To align with the project's coding guidelines and the learnings about POSIX built-ins, consider using
printfinstead ofechofor the debug message:- printf "::debug::%s\n" "Found ${_TEST_ROOT_DIR} ..." ; + printf "::debug::Found %s ...\n" "${_TEST_ROOT_DIR}" ;This change maintains consistency with POSIX standards and improves portability.
198-200: Approve output grouping and summary reporting with a minor suggestionThe addition of output grouping for each file check and the call to
report_summaryat the end of the script greatly improve the readability and completeness of the script's output. This aligns well with the PR objectives for enhanced error reporting.For consistency with the rest of the script, consider using
printfinstead ofechofor the group commands:- printf "::group::%s\n" "Checking ${FILE}" ; + printf "::group::Checking %s\n" "${FILE}" ;Apply this change to both the opening and closing group commands for consistency.
Also applies to: 204-204
multicast/exceptions.py (1)
252-252: Remove unnecessary parentheses inifstatementsPer PEP 8 guidelines, avoid unnecessary parentheses in
ifstatements. The parentheses are not required for simple conditions.Apply this diff:
- if sys.stderr.isatty(): + if sys.stderr.isatty():Also applies to: 261-261
multicast/__init__.py (1)
363-368: Review import logic to simplify cyclic import handlingThe current import logic for the
exceptionsmodule appears complex and may introduce maintainability issues. Consider restructuring the code to avoid cyclic imports, potentially by reorganizing the code or using local imports within functions as needed.tests/context.py (1)
Line range hint
25-143: Consider refactoring repeated import handling codeThe multiple
try-exceptblocks for importing modules contain redundant patterns. Refactoring this code can improve maintainability and reduce duplication. You could create a utility function to handle module imports or use a loop to iterate over module names.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- multicast/init.py (2 hunks)
- multicast/exceptions.py (1 hunks)
- tests/check_spelling (4 hunks)
- tests/context.py (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
multicast/__init__.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
multicast/exceptions.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
tests/check_spelling (1)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
tests/context.py (2)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T04:40:19.258Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to keep un-mapped exit codes as they are until they are ready to be mapped.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/check_spelling (2)
192-192: Approve debug message for auto-correctionThe addition of this debug message improves the script's observability by clearly indicating when auto-correction is enabled. This aligns well with the overall improvements in error reporting and script behavior visibility.
Line range hint
1-214: Overall assessment: Approve with minor suggestionsThe changes to the
tests/check_spellingscript significantly improve error reporting and align well with the PR objectives. The introduction of thereport_summaryfunction, along with the use of GitHub Actions workflow commands, enhances the script's output clarity, especially in CI environments. The added debug messages and error handling improvements contribute to better observability and troubleshooting capabilities.While the changes are generally well-implemented, there are a few minor suggestions for consistency and alignment with project guidelines:
- Fix the path in the
SCRIPT_FILEvariable.- Use
printfconsistently instead ofechofor POSIX compatibility.- Make minor adjustments to variable usage in error messages for consistency.
These suggestions are minor and do not impact the overall functionality of the script. Once addressed, the changes will fully meet the project's standards and objectives.
tests/context.py (2)
601-601: Verify exit code usage aligns with CEP-8 standardsEnsure that using
exit_code=66for missing command arguments aligns with the CEP-8 exit code mappings. According to standard conventions, exit code 66 typically signifies input-related errors. Verify that this code appropriately represents the error condition.
608-608: Confirm appropriate exit code for command execution errorsUsing
exit_code=2for general command execution errors may not align with CEP-8 standards. Exit code 2 can be associated with incorrect usage or command syntax errors. Verify that this exit code accurately reflects the error and is consistent with the project's exit code mappings.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/check_spelling (1)
159-171: LGTM: Enhanced error reporting with structured outputThe new
report_summaryfunction significantly improves the script's output clarity by providing structured and categorized results. The use of GitHub Actions workflow commands enhances readability in CI/CD pipelines.Consider adding a comment explaining the meaning of each EXIT_CODE value at the beginning of the function for better maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- multicast/exceptions.py (1 hunks)
- tests/check_spelling (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- multicast/exceptions.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
tests/check_spelling (1)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T04:40:19.258Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to keep un-mapped exit codes as they are until they are ready to be mapped.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/check_spelling (4)
130-132: LGTM: Improved error reporting consistencyThe addition of the
SCRIPT_FILEvariable with the correct path "tests/check_spelling" addresses the previous review comment and enhances consistency in error reporting throughout the script.
180-182: LGTM: Improved feedback for repository detectionThe addition of debug and error messages for repository detection enhances the script's ability to provide meaningful feedback during execution. The use of
SCRIPT_FILEin the error message maintains consistency with earlier changes.
192-192: LGTM: Improved transparency for auto-correction modeThe addition of a debug message to indicate when auto-correction is enabled improves the script's transparency about its operational mode, aligning with the overall enhancement in feedback throughout the script.
198-200: LGTM: Enhanced output readability with GitHub Actions groupingThe use of GitHub Actions grouping commands for output messages and the addition of the
report_summarycall at the end of the script significantly improve the readability of the output, especially in CI/CD environments. These changes align with best practices for GitHub Actions workflows and provide a clear summary of the script's execution.Also applies to: 204-204
Changes in file multicast/__init__.py: - dropped redundent global syntax Changes in file multicast/exceptions.py: - fixed class CommandExecutionError's __init__ by reverting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
multicast/exceptions.py (3)
72-141: LGTM! Consider optimizing metadata declarations.The declarations of
__package__,__module__,__file__, and__name__provide important metadata about the module. The inclusion of test cases in the docstrings is a good practice for ensuring correct setup.However, some of these declarations might be redundant as they are typically set by Python itself. Consider removing the explicit declarations of
__file__and__name__, as these are automatically set by Python and overriding them is generally not recommended.
155-212: LGTM! Consider simplifying the init method.The
CommandExecutionErrorclass is well-implemented and documented, including clear descriptions and meta-testing in the docstring. The__init__method is flexible, allowing for various ways of specifying the exit code.However, the initialization logic could be simplified for better readability. Consider streamlining the
__init__method by directly passing the message tosuper().__init__()and leveragingException's built-in message handling.Apply this diff to simplify the initializer:
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): - if len(args) > 0 and isinstance(args[-1], int): - exit_code = args[-1] - args = args[:-1] - else: - exit_code = kwargs.pop("exit_code", 1) - super().__init__(*args, **kwargs) - self.message = args[0] if args else kwargs.get("message", "An error occurred") + exit_code = kwargs.pop("exit_code", 1) + message = args[0] if args else kwargs.get("message", "An error occurred") + super().__init__(message) self.exit_code = exit_code
241-271: LGTM! Robust error handling. Minor inconsistency in terminal checks.The utility functions
get_exit_code_from_exceptionandexit_on_exceptionprovide comprehensive error handling and exit code management. The decorator pattern used inexit_on_exceptioneffectively wraps functions to manage exceptions and system exits.However, there's a minor inconsistency in checking for terminal output. Line 255 checks
sys.stderr.isatty(), while line 264 checkssys.stdout.isatty(). For consistency, consider usingsys.stderr.isatty()in both cases, as error messages are typically written to stderr.Apply this diff to correct the inconsistency:
- if (sys.stdout.isatty()): + if (sys.stderr.isatty()): print( f"{EXIT_CODES[exit_code][1]}: {exc}", file=sys.stderrmulticast/__init__.py (3)
30-34: Consider removing.__func__attributes from__all__The additions to
__all__are consistent with implementing custom exceptions. However, including.__func__attributes (e.g.,exceptions.get_exit_code_from_exception.__func__) in__all__might be unnecessary, as these are internal attributes not typically meant for public API exposure.Consider removing the
.__func__attributes:__all__ = [ """__package__""", """__module__""", """__name__""", """__version__""", """__prologue__""", """__doc__""", """exceptions""", """exceptions.CommandExecutionError""", """exceptions.get_exit_code_from_exception""", - """exceptions.get_exit_code_from_exception.__func__""", """exceptions.exit_on_exception""", - """exceptions.exit_on_exception.__func__""", """get_exit_code_from_exception""", """exit_on_exception""",
361-362: Consider removing commented-out global declarationsThe commented-out global declarations for
EXIT_CODESandEXCEPTION_EXIT_CODESare unnecessary at the module level. Removing them would make the code cleaner.Consider removing these lines entirely:
-# global EXIT_CODES # skipcq: PYL-W0604 -# global EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES # skipcq: PYL-W0604
363-377: LGTM: Exception handling enhancements addedThe new imports and assignments related to exceptions are consistent with the PR objectives. The code handles potential cyclic imports appropriately.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of these assignments, for example:
# Import and expose exception-related components for easier access
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- multicast/init.py (2 hunks)
- multicast/exceptions.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
multicast/__init__.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
multicast/exceptions.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T04:40:19.258Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to keep un-mapped exit codes as they are until they are ready to be mapped.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.multicast/__init__.py (1)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#169 File: tests/context.py:136-141 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T08:39:54.228Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to replace triple double quotes with single double quotes to maintain consistency across the project.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
multicast/exceptions.py (4)
1-69: LGTM! Comprehensive file header and module docstring.The file header and module docstring are well-structured and informative. They include necessary information such as copyright notice, license details, and usage instructions. The inclusion of minimal acceptance testing procedures within the docstring is a good practice for ensuring the module's functionality.
144-152: LGTM! Robust import error handling.The import statements and error handling are well-implemented. The use of relative imports for
sysandargparseis intentional for memory optimization. The try-except block provides thorough error handling for import failures, including contextual information in the raisedImportError. This approach enhances debugging capabilities.
215-238: LGTM! Comprehensive exit code mapping.The
EXIT_CODESandEXCEPTION_EXIT_CODESdictionaries provide a thorough and well-organized mapping of exit codes to exception types and descriptions. This centralized approach to managing exit codes enhances maintainability and consistency across the module. The use of a dictionary comprehension forEXCEPTION_EXIT_CODESis an efficient way to derive the exception-to-exit-code mapping.
1-271: Overall, excellent implementation of exception handling for the multicast module.This file provides a comprehensive and well-structured system for managing exceptions and exit codes. The implementation includes:
- A custom
CommandExecutionErrorclass- Detailed mappings of exit codes to exceptions and descriptions
- Utility functions for exception handling and exit code management
The code is well-documented with docstrings and includes minimal acceptance testing, which is a great practice. A few minor suggestions for improvements have been made, but these are mostly optimizations rather than critical issues.
Great job on implementing this robust error handling system!
multicast/__init__.py (2)
38-38: LGTM: New exception-related constants added to__all__The addition of
EXIT_CODESandEXCEPTION_EXIT_CODESto__all__is consistent with the PR objectives and follows appropriate naming conventions for constants.
379-379: LGTM: Improved readability with spacingThe added empty line improves readability by separating the exception-related code from the rest of the module.
…eptions.py (- WIP PR #169 -)
Changes in file multicast/exceptions.py: - minor style fix.
### ChangeLog: Changes in file multicast/exceptions.py: def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
multicast/exceptions.py (4)
1-152: LGTM! Well-structured module with comprehensive docstring.The module docstring, metadata variables, and import error handling are well-implemented. However, consider using a more specific exception type in the import error handling for better error classification.
Consider replacing the generic
Exceptionwith more specific exception types that could occur during import, such asImportErrororModuleNotFoundError:try: from . import sys # skipcq: PYL-C0414 from . import argparse # skipcq: PYL-C0414 -except Exception as err: +except (ImportError, ModuleNotFoundError) as err: baton = ImportError(err, str("[CWE-758] Module failed completely.")) baton.module = __module__ baton.path = __file__ baton.__cause__ = err raise baton from err
230-333: LGTM! Well-structured exit code and exception mappings.The EXIT_CODES and EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES dictionaries are well-implemented and thoroughly documented. The inclusion of CEP-8 compliance information and testing sections is commendable.
For consistency, consider using the same docstring style for both dictionaries. The EXIT_CODES docstring uses a mix of single and double quotes for code blocks, while EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES uses only single quotes. Standardizing on triple double quotes for all code blocks would improve consistency:
Usage Example: - ```python + """python from multicast.exceptions import EXIT_CODES from multicast.exceptions import get_exit_code_from_exception try: # Code that may raise an exception pass except Exception as e: exit_code = get_exit_code_from_exception(e) sys.exit(exit_code) - ``` + """
336-369: LGTM! Well-implemented exception to exit code mapping function.The get_exit_code_from_exception function is well-designed, efficiently implemented, and thoroughly documented with good test cases.
Consider using the
dict.get()method with a default value to simplify the function and potentially improve performance:def get_exit_code_from_exception(exc): - if type(exc) in EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES: - return EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES[type(exc)] - for exc_class in EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES: - if isinstance(exc, exc_class): - return EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES[exc_class] - return 70 # Default to 'Internal Software Error' + return EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES.get(type(exc)) or next( + (code for exc_class, code in EXCEPTION_EXIT_CODES.items() if isinstance(exc, exc_class)), + 70 # Default to 'Internal Software Error' + )This change reduces the number of lines while maintaining the same functionality and potentially improving performance by avoiding the explicit loop.
372-446: LGTM! Well-implemented exception handling decorator.The exit_on_exception decorator is well-designed, thoroughly documented, and includes good test cases. The handling of different exception types and the use of isatty() for appropriate error output are commendable.
For consistency, consider using sys.stderr.isatty() in both exception handling blocks:
except BaseException as exc: exit_code = get_exit_code_from_exception(exc) - if (sys.stdout.isatty()): + if (sys.stderr.isatty()): print( f"{EXIT_CODES[exit_code][1]}: {exc}", file=sys.stderr )This change ensures that the same check is used for both SystemExit and BaseException cases, improving consistency in error handling.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- multicast/exceptions.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
multicast/exceptions.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T04:40:19.258Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to keep un-mapped exit codes as they are until they are ready to be mapped.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.multicast/exceptions.py (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-11T21:41:34.364Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to use a centralized `EXIT_CODES` dictionary in Python scripts to standardize exit codes and messages as per CEP-8.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0 File: :0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-11T21:15:37.121Z Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to use a centralized `EXIT_CODES` dictionary in Python scripts to standardize exit codes and messages as per CEP-8. This work is tracked in GH issue #117.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
multicast/exceptions.py (2)
155-227: LGTM! Well-implemented CommandExecutionError class.The CommandExecutionError class is well-designed and thoroughly documented. The flexible init method and comprehensive docstring with meta-testing examples are particularly noteworthy.
449-454: LGTM! Comprehensive all list.The all list provides a clear definition of the module's public interface, including all important classes, functions, and variables.
### ChangeLog: Changes in file multicast/exceptions.py: def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation