-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Add preliminary support for inline assembly for msp430. #93219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @lcnr (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Oops... I need to update |
74e01e1
to
19809ed
Compare
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 19809ed has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91526 (rustc_lint: Some early linting refactorings) - rust-lang#92555 (Implement RFC 3151: Scoped threads.) - rust-lang#93213 (Fix `let_chains` and `if_let_guard` feature flags) - rust-lang#93219 (Add preliminary support for inline assembly for msp430.) - rust-lang#93226 (Normalize field access types during borrowck) - rust-lang#93227 (Liberate late bound regions when collecting GAT substs in wfcheck) - rust-lang#93229 (Remove DiagnosticBuilder.quiet) - rust-lang#93234 (rustc_mir_itertools: Avoid needless `collect` with itertools) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors bot
added a commit
to rust-embedded/svd2rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2022
577: Bring documentation on MSP430 up to date. r=burrbull a=cr1901 Crate versions must be `0.3.0` or higher now; minor version `0.2.0` and below is unsupported due to (among other things) bumping to bare-metal `1.0.0` and [using](rust-lang/rust#93219) Rust inline assembly to implement useful operations. Co-authored-by: William D. Jones <[email protected]>
bors bot
added a commit
to rust-embedded/svd2rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2022
577: Bring documentation on MSP430 up to date. r=burrbull a=cr1901 Crate versions must be `0.3.0` or higher now; minor version `0.2.0` and below is unsupported due to (among other things) bumping to bare-metal `1.0.0` and [using](rust-lang/rust#93219) Rust inline assembly to implement useful operations. Co-authored-by: William D. Jones <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
llvm_asm
macro was removed recently, and the MSP430 backend relies on inline assembly to build useful embedded apps. I conveniently "found" time to implement basic support for the new inlineasm
macro syntax with the help of @Amanieu :D.In addition to tests in the compiler, I have tested this locally against deployed MSP430 code and have not found any noticeable differences in firmware operation or
objdump
disassemblies between the oldllvm_asm
and the newasm
syntax.