Skip to content

Conversation

@haydentherapper
Copy link
Contributor

Introduced in #1396, this incorrectly checked err instead
of verifySctErr. This resulted in no error being printed
when SCT validation failed. Verified this is working
correctly now with local testing.

Signed-off-by: Hayden Blauzvern [email protected]

Summary

Ticket Link

Fixes

Release Note


Introduced in sigstore#1396, this incorrectly checked err instead
of verifySctErr. This resulted in no error being printed
when SCT validation failed. Verified this is working
correctly now with local testing.

Signed-off-by: Hayden Blauzvern <[email protected]>
@haydentherapper
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failing CI test seems unrelated, can someone kick it off again?

@dlorenc
Copy link
Member

dlorenc commented Feb 8, 2022

I have a fix for the ci here: #1415

@dlorenc dlorenc merged commit 1d15273 into sigstore:main Feb 8, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v1.6.0 milestone Feb 8, 2022
hatmarch pushed a commit to hatmarch/cosign that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2022
Introduced in sigstore#1396, this incorrectly checked err instead
of verifySctErr. This resulted in no error being printed
when SCT validation failed. Verified this is working
correctly now with local testing.

Signed-off-by: Hayden Blauzvern <[email protected]>
mlieberman85 pushed a commit to mlieberman85/cosign that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
Introduced in sigstore#1396, this incorrectly checked err instead
of verifySctErr. This resulted in no error being printed
when SCT validation failed. Verified this is working
correctly now with local testing.

Signed-off-by: Hayden Blauzvern <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants