Skip to content

Conversation

@hvaghani221
Copy link
Contributor

Comment on lines 282 to 284
host = @hec_host.delete_prefix("/").delete_suffix("/").split("/", 2)
host_suffix = host[1].nil? ? "" : "/#{host[1]}"
URI("https://#{host[0]}:#{@hec_port}#{host_suffix}/services/collector")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it can only support one path, right? can it be updated so that it can support any number of it?
like https://mydomain.com/splunk/hec

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe a better approach would be adding another parameter. full_url.
use full_url if provided. if not build one using host, port, and protocol .
@chaitanyaphalak any thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it can only support one path, right? can it be updated so that it can support any number of it? like https://mydomain.com/splunk/hec

It will support any number of path as I am splitting host in 2 half only.
For mydomain.com/splunk/hec, it will split into mydomain.com and splunk/hec and will be join them with port value

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like rock's idea

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@harshit-splunk i see. so it works.
hmm still, this way of parsing is not intuitive for the user.
instead of full_url we can add url_path parameter.
default would be "" but user can set it to /splunk/hec or anything.

However, having a full_url parameter is something that will benefit usability in the future. we can use it in the helm chart to reduce number of arguments that they need to pass.
this way, we are consistent with olly chart. (ie splunkPlatform.endpoint)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@harshit-splunk
So I would like to suggest to edit this PR with full_url approach.

@rockb1017 rockb1017 merged commit b1ea91a into develop Dec 8, 2021
@rockb1017 rockb1017 deleted the sck-issue-665 branch December 8, 2021 00:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants