Skip to content

Look at all cookies instead just the first #645

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eddumelendez
Copy link
Contributor

Previous to this commit, just the first cookie is considered. Now, all
cookies are considered to look for SESSION cookie.

See gh-275

Initial draft

Previous to this commit, just the first cookie is considered. Now, all
cookies are considered to look for SESSION cookie.

See spring-projectsgh-275
@rwinch rwinch added this to the 2.0 M1 milestone Nov 16, 2016
@rwinch rwinch modified the milestones: 2.0.0 M1, 2.0.0.M2 May 10, 2017
@rwinch rwinch modified the milestones: 2.0.0.M2, 2.0.0.M3 Jun 16, 2017
@rwinch rwinch modified the milestones: 2.0.0.M3, 2.0.0.M4 Jul 21, 2017
@rwinch rwinch modified the milestones: 2.0.0.M4, 2.0.0.M5 Sep 13, 2017
@rwinch rwinch modified the milestones: 2.0.0.M5, 2.0.0.RC1 Oct 3, 2017
@vpavic vpavic removed this from the 2.0.0.RC1 milestone Oct 25, 2017
@oatesp
Copy link

oatesp commented Oct 26, 2017

I'm really interested in getting this merged as it's currently holding me back from using spring-session in my project. Is anyone able to take a look at this and consider if it is mergeable?

@vpavic
Copy link
Contributor

vpavic commented Oct 26, 2017

@oatesp We are currently working on a broader refactoring of HttpSessionStrategy that will, among other things, address #275. See #906 to track the progress of that effort, we expect it to be a part of the upcoming 2.0.0.RC1 milestone.

Also note that this PR by itself does not address the original issue since the resolved session id's are not actually validated against the session store.

@vpavic
Copy link
Contributor

vpavic commented Oct 26, 2017

@eddumelendez Thanks for the PR, we are addressing this in a bit different way as explained in the comment above.

@vpavic vpavic closed this Oct 26, 2017
@vpavic vpavic added status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply and removed status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply labels Oct 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants