Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Sep 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated OpenAPI specification: standardized operation identifiers for /v1/serp/{path}. No changes to request/response formats or error handling.
  • Chores
    • Aligned API operation IDs for consistency across GET and POST, improving compatibility with client generation tools. Regenerate API clients to reflect new method names. No runtime behavior changes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 20, 2025

Walkthrough

OpenAPI spec update: for /v1/serp/{path}, both GET and POST operationId values are set to serp_v1_serp__path__post. No changes to parameters, responses, path definitions, or error handling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
OpenAPI: operationId renames
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml
Unified operationId for /v1/serp/{path} GET and POST to serp_v1_serp__path__post; no other schema changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I hop through specs with gentle tread,
Renaming trails from “get” to “post” instead.
One path, one name—so neat, so tight,
A tidy burrow in API light.
Thump-thump! says the reviewer’s heart—approved, alright! 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title "feat:@coderabbitai" is ambiguous and does not summarize the primary change in this PR (which updates OpenAPI operationId values in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml). It looks like an automated or placeholder title referencing a bot/author and provides no actionable context for reviewers or for project history. Because the title is non-descriptive, it is insufficient to determine the PR's intent from the title alone. Please rename the PR to a concise, descriptive title such as "chore(openapi): update operationId for GET/POST /v1/serp/{path}" and add a short PR description explaining why the operationId changed and whether there are any consumer-facing impacts; this will make the change clear in review history.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202509200329

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) September 20, 2025 03:30
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit 994b987 into main Sep 20, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202509200329 branch September 20, 2025 03:31
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Set /v1/serp/{path} operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__post Sep 20, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91c1ad2 and 5252616.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)

- serp
summary: Serp
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

operationId collision: GET must not reuse POST’s operationId

GET currently uses serp_v1_serp__path__post, duplicating POST. OpenAPI requires unique operationId per operation; this breaks many client generators and tooling. Rename GET’s operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__get to restore uniqueness and match the convention used elsewhere in the spec.

Apply this diff:

@@
-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get

Run to detect any remaining duplicates:

Also applies to: 330-330


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
rg -n 'operationId:\s*' src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml | awk 'match($0,/operationId:\s*([^\s]+)/,a){print a[1]}' | sort | uniq -cd

Length of output: 9


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

file="src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml"
if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then
  echo "File not found: $file" >&2
  exit 1
fi

echo "=== operationId occurrences (value : file:line) ==="
awk 'match($0,/operationId:[[:space:]]*([^[:space:]]+)/,a){print a[1] " : " FILENAME ":" FNR}' "$file" | sort

echo
echo "=== duplicate operationId counts ==="
awk 'match($0,/operationId:[[:space:]]*([^[:space:]]+)/,a){print a[1]}' "$file" | sort | uniq -cd

echo
echo "=== full lines where operationId appears ==="
awk 'match($0,/operationId:[[:space:]]*([^[:space:]]+)/,a){print FILENAME ":" FNR ":" $0}' "$file"

echo
echo "=== context for duplicated operationIds ==="
for id in $(awk 'match($0,/operationId:[[:space:]]*([^[:space:]]+)/,a){print a[1]}' "$file" | sort | uniq -d); do
  echo
  echo "----- DUPLICATE: $id -----"
  rg -n -C3 "operationId:\\s*$id" "$file" || true
done

Length of output: 2783


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

file="src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml"
if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then
  echo "File not found: $file" >&2
  exit 1
fi

awk 'match($0,/operationId:[[:space:]]*([^[:space:]]+)/,a){print FNR ":" a[1]}' "$file" | sort -n | while IFS=: read -r ln id; do
  start=$((ln-6)); if [ $start -lt 1 ]; then start=1; fi
  end=$((ln+6))
  echo "----- $file lines $start-$end (operationId: $id at line $ln) -----"
  sed -n "${start},${end}p" "$file"
  echo
done

Length of output: 6824


operationId collision — rename GET's operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__get

GET at '/v1/serp/{path}' (src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml:306) reuses the POST operationId (line 330); rename the GET operationId to restore uniqueness.

Apply this diff:

@@
-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around line 306, the GET operationId currently
duplicates the POST operationId (serp_v1_serp__path__post); change the GET
operationId to a unique name such as serp_v1_serp__path__get to restore
uniqueness, and update any internal references or client generation mappings
that expect the old name so they point to the new operationId.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants