Skip to content

Conversation

@HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Sep 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated API specification to align operation identifiers for the /v1/serp/{path} endpoints. No changes to request/response behavior.
  • Chores
    • Standardized operation IDs across GET and POST for consistency, improving compatibility with client generation and tooling.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 20, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated OpenAPI spec: both GET and POST operations under /v1/serp/{path} now share the operationId serp_v1_serp__path__post, replacing the previous serp_v1_serp__path__get for GET. No other changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
OpenAPI operationId rename
src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml
For /v1/serp/{path}, set operationId to serp_v1_serp__path__post for both GET and POST; removed prior GET operationId serp_v1_serp__path__get.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In YAML fields I hop with care,
Two serp paths now a single pair.
GET or POST, one name we boast,
A tidy tag from coast to coast.
Thump-thump keys, I sign and post—
A rabbit’s merge, concise as toast. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title "feat:@coderabbitai" is a token/mention that does not describe the PR contents; the changeset actually renames operationId values in src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml for GET and POST /v1/serp/{path}. Because it fails to summarize the primary change or intent, it is too vague for reviewers scanning history. Please replace the title with a concise descriptive summary such as "chore(openapi): rename operationId for GET/POST /v1/serp/{path}" or "fix(openapi): unify operationId for /v1/serp/{path}"; keep it short, state the primary change and optionally the affected path/file so reviewers immediately understand the intent.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bot/update-openapi_202509201519

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@HavenDV HavenDV enabled auto-merge (squash) September 20, 2025 15:20
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit 9a17833 into main Sep 20, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202509201519 branch September 20, 2025 15:21
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Set GET and POST /v1/serp/{path} to serp_v1_serp__path__post Sep 20, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c862f5 and 6070670.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Jina/Generated/Jina.Models.SerpV1SerpPathPostResponse2.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)

- serp
summary: Serp
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

Duplicate operationId across GET and POST breaks SDK generation; fix GET to use its own operationId.

Both GET and POST under /v1/serp/{path} share serp_v1_serp__path__post. operationId must be unique; many generators will overwrite one method or fail.

Apply this diff:

   /v1/serp/{path}:
     get:
       tags:
         - serp
       summary: Serp
-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
...
     post:
       tags:
         - serp
       summary: Serp
       operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post

Run to detect any remaining duplicates:

Also applies to: 330-330


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
pip -q install pyyaml >/dev/null
python - <<'PY'
import yaml, collections
from pathlib import Path
doc = yaml.safe_load(Path('src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml').read_text())
ops=[]
for path, node in (doc.get('paths') or {}).items():
  for method, op in node.items():
    if method.lower() in {'get','post','put','patch','delete','head','options','trace'}:
      oid = (op or {}).get('operationId')
      ops.append((oid, path, method.upper()))
dups = [oid for oid, c in collections.Counter(o for o,_,_ in ops).items() if c>1]
if dups:
  print('Duplicate operationIds found:')
  for oid in dups:
    for o,p,m in ops:
      if o==oid:
        print(f'  {oid}: {m} {p}')
  raise SystemExit(1)
print('No duplicate operationIds.')
PY

Length of output: 126


Duplicate operationId across GET and POST — change GET to serp_v1_serp__path__get.

GET and POST under /v1/serp/{path} both use operationId serp_v1_serp__path__post; operationId must be unique or SDK generators will fail/overwrite.

File: src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml (GET: line 306, POST: line 330)

Apply this diff:

   /v1/serp/{path}:
     get:
       tags:
         - serp
       summary: Serp
-      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
+      operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
...
     post:
       tags:
         - serp
       summary: Serp
       operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__post
operationId: serp_v1_serp__path__get
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/libs/Jina/openapi.yaml around line 306, the GET operation for
/v1/serp/{path} currently uses the duplicate operationId
"serp_v1_serp__path__post"; update that operationId to "serp_v1_serp__path__get"
to ensure uniqueness (and check nearby POST at line ~330 remains
"serp_v1_serp__path__post"), then run any OpenAPI validators or SDK generators
to confirm no naming collisions and update any code references if they rely on
the old operationId.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants