[megatron] fix: the NPU error that occurs after migrating from megatron worker to engine worker.

[xiazhahe]

What does this PR do?

Add concise overview of what this PR aims to achieve or accomplish. Reference related GitHub issues and PRs that help with the review.

After migrating from megatron worker to engine worker, there is no longer Critic worker to use.
Fix the error occurs on NPU: AssertionError: Unknown device: npu for model_type: value_model and backend: megatron.

Checklist Before Starting

• Search for similar PRs. Paste at least one query link here: ...
• Format the PR title as [{modules}] {type}: {description} (This will be checked by the CI)
  • {modules} include fsdp, megatron, veomni, sglang, vllm, vllm_omni, rollout, trainer, ci, training_utils, recipe, hardware, deployment, ray, worker, single_controller, misc, perf, model, algo, env, tool, ckpt, doc, data, cfg, reward, fully_async, one_step_off
  • If this PR involves multiple modules, separate them with , like [megatron, fsdp, doc]
  • {type} is in feat, fix, refactor, chore, test
  • If this PR breaks any API (CLI arguments, config, function signature, etc.), add [BREAKING] to the beginning of the title.
  • Example: [BREAKING][fsdp, megatron] feat: dynamic batching

Test

For changes that can not be tested by CI (e.g., algorithm implementation, new model support), validate by experiment(s) and show results like training curve plots, evaluation results, etc.

API and Usage Example

Demonstrate how the API changes if any, and provide usage example(s) if possible.

# Add code snippet or script demonstrating how to use this

Design & Code Changes

Demonstrate the high-level design if this PR is complex, and list the specific changes.

Checklist Before Submitting

Important

Please check all the following items before requesting a review, otherwise the reviewer might deprioritize this PR for review.

• Read the Contribute Guide.
• Apply pre-commit checks: pre-commit install && pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failure --color=always
• Add / Update the documentation.
• Add unit or end-to-end test(s) to the CI workflow to cover all the code. If not feasible, explain why: ...
• Once your PR is ready for CI, send a message in the ci-request channel in the verl Slack workspace. (If not accessible, please try the Feishu group (飞书群).)
• If your PR is related to the recipe submodule, please also update the reference to the submodule commit via git submodule update --remote or cd recipe && git pull origin main.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces MindspeedEngineWithValueHead and MegatronEngineWithValueHead across the engine worker modules to support value models. The review feedback identifies several improvement opportunities: an unused import of repatch in engine_workers.py should be removed, a redundant init method in MindspeedEngineWithValueHead can be deleted, and the duplicated patching logic in _init_device_mesh should be refactored into a shared helper function to improve maintainability.

[gemini-code-assist]

The import of repatch in verl/workers/engine_workers.py is unused and redundant. The repatch function is already imported and called within the specific engine implementations (e.g., in verl/workers/engine/mindspeed/transformer_impl.py) during their initialization. Adding it here at the top level of the worker file introduces unnecessary module loading and dead code.

[gemini-code-assist]

The __init__ method in MindspeedEngineWithValueHead is redundant as it only calls super().__init__ with the exact same arguments as the base class MegatronEngineWithValueHead (and its ancestor MegatronEngine). In Python, this can be omitted to improve code clarity and maintainability.

[wuxibin89]

Please format code before commit: https://github.com/verl-project/verl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#code-linting-and-formatting