Skip to content

Remove caveat about expanding values of terms which are graph contain… #145

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2019

Conversation

gkellogg
Copy link
Member

@gkellogg gkellogg commented Sep 1, 2019

…ers where the value is already a graph.

Fixes #144. Relates to #143.


Preview | Diff

…ers where the value is already a graph.

Fixes #144. Relates to #143.
@gkellogg gkellogg requested a review from dlongley September 1, 2019 20:56
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Sep 6, 2019

This issue was discussed in a meeting.

  • RESOLVED: Close api #143 as resolved by api PR #145 and #146
View the transcript Framing blank nodes
Rob Sanderson: last discussion we agreed that we couldn’t solve it on a call
… so gkellog and dlongley went off to look at it
Gregg Kellogg: we found a problem in a framing test where @container : @graph got mangled in re-expansion
… a bug in the compaction algo
… if the value is an array, it puts them in an @included block
… i tried [s solution] but it turned out not to be defined well enough
Rob Sanderson: all of that is solved and merged?
Gregg Kellogg: yep
Gregg Kellogg: See API PR #146
Gregg Kellogg: See API PR #145
Proposed resolution: Close framing #27 as not being the issue, and the real issues being addressed is api #143, solved by api PRs # 145 and #146 (Rob Sanderson)
Rob Sanderson: +1
Benjamin Young: +1
Dave Longley: +1
Gregg Kellogg: +1
Ivan Herman: +1
Adam Soroka: +1
Pierre-Antoine Champin: +1
Ruben Taelman: +1
Rob Sanderson: RESOLVE: Close framing #27 as not being the issue, and the real issues being addressed is api #143, solved by api PRs # 145 and #146
Proposed resolution: Close api #143 as resolved by api PR #145 and #146 (Rob Sanderson)
Rob Sanderson: +1
Ivan Herman: +1
Ruben Taelman: +1
Gregg Kellogg: +1
Adam Soroka: +1
Pierre-Antoine Champin: +1
Benjamin Young: +1
Dave Longley: +1
Resolution #2: Close api #143 as resolved by api PR #145 and #146

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Node map generation seems to miss anonymous graph name
3 participants