Add issue marker for rdf:JSON datatype.

[gkellogg]

The rdf:JSON datatype is originally defined in Section 10.2 The rdf:JSON Datatype in JSON-LD 1.1. This issue is to promote the definition to RDF Concepts (and RDF Schema) to keep it with the definition of other datatypes in the RDF namespace.

See also w3c/rdf-schema#7.

For #14.

---

Preview | Diff

[afs]

Unclear - there seem to be two discussions on the location of rdf:JSON text -- w3c/rdf-schema#7.

[TallTed]

I'd add markers for both discussions to relevant doc(s). These markers do not reflect any decision, including on whether work is to be done, only that discussion is taking place in a GitHub Issue.

[gkellogg]

I'd add markers for both discussions to relevant doc(s). These markers do not reflect any decision, including on whether work is to be done, only that discussion is taking place in a GitHub Issue.

I update the issue description; is that what you're referring to? Or, are there other links you think are necessary. Similar changes should probably go in w3c/rdf-schema#7.

[TallTed]

@gkellogg -- I had misread this as issue, not PR, #18. So I have some suggested changes...

The rdf:JSON datatype is originally defined in Section 10.2 The rdf:JSON Datatype in JSON-LD 1.1. This issue is to promote the definition to RDF Concepts (and RDF Schema) to keep it with the definition of other datatypes in the RDF namespace.

I would open a new issue on rdf-concepts (#14 is overflowing with rather unfocused discussion), with an initial comment of the following (revision of the above) --

The rdf:JSON datatype is originally defined in Section 10.2 The rdf:JSON Datatype in JSON-LD 1.1. This issue is to determine whether to promote that definition to RDF Concepts (and RDF Schema), which would bring it in line with the definition of other datatypes in the RDF namespace.

I would also update the initial comment in w3c/rdf-schema#7 to echo the above, slightly modified to make its focus rdf-schema rather than rdf-concepts.

Then, I would put issue markers in RDF Concepts and RDF Schema HTML documents, which markers refer back to the new rdf-concepts issue and to w3c/rdf-schema#7, respectively.

[gkellogg]

I don't see the point in creating a new issue; instead, I updated the initial issue description as you suggested (preserving the original text lower down).

I'll leave it up to @domel to update w3c/rdf-schema#7.

Please consider suggesting edits to spec/index.html in this PR for any specific wording you'd like to see appear in the issue text.

[gkellogg]

Discussed on today's call, but for good form, co-editors should approve.