Request vp media type

[OR13]

---

Preview | Diff

[awoie]

If VPs stay in the spec, then this lgtm.

[iherman]

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-06-07

• no resolutions were taken

View the transcript

1.2. JWT PRs.

Orie Steele: There are 2 new PRs on VC-JWT, 103 and 104.

See github pull request vc-jwt#103.

See github pull request vc-jwt#104.

Orie Steele: There are 2 new PRs on VC-JWT, 103 and 104.

See github pull request vc-data-model#1144.

Orie Steele: PRs up in the core data model 1144.

Phillip Long: pdl-ASU has joined #vcwg.

Joe Andrieu: Added a comment to 103. Would it be useful to reuse the pattern for VCs. A base media type plus securing?
… both securing mechanisms will need a payload with a common basis.

Dmitri Zagidulin: +1 Joe, I was wondering about that as well.

Orie Steele: correct, that is what it is doing.

Dave Longley: agrees it is following the same pattern.

Orie Steele: talking about confidence method in registry.

Dave Longley: +1 to adding confidence method to the reserved terms table + v2 context, sounds good.

Brent Zundel: 9 open PRs, please review and look thru them.
… moving on to final topic, issues.

Ted Thibodeau Jr.: suggest that we call out specific issues and PRs in agenda ahead of time.

Orie Steele: There are also several open PRs here: https://github.com/w3c/vc-status-list-2021/pulls which can be discussed.

[iherman]

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-06-14

• no resolutions were taken

View the transcript

1.3. Request vp media type (pr vc-data-model#1144)

See github pull request vc-data-model#1144.

Manu Sporny: pull 1144 adds a media type for vps.
… expect that to merge soon.

[msporny]

Suggested change

	This media type can be used with credentials secured using an <a>external proof</a>.
	This media type can be used with credentials secured using an <a>external proof</a>.

Hmm, this looks wrong? Is this ("credentials" instead of "presentations") what we're trying to say? I'm going to merge this, but wondering if this is a copy-paste error. If so, @OR13, can you fix it in a future (editorial) PR?

[msporny]

Normative, multiple reviews, no changes requested, no objections, merging.