You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a date separator is scrolled near the top of the message list's viewport, it pushes the sticky header up off the top of the screen:
In other words it does the same thing that a new recipient header would do. (Once the date separator reaches the top of the viewport, though, the header reappears — this time the one provided by the date separator, so it looks the same as the old recipient header except for its date.)
But a date separator doesn't have all the information a recipient header does, so it doesn't replace the old recipient header and shouldn't push it off the screen. Instead, it should behave the same as a message, and let the preceding item's sticky header overlap into it.
This is a sort of followup to #173 / #469, where we introduced date separators in the first place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When a date separator is scrolled near the top of the message list's viewport, it pushes the sticky header up off the top of the screen:

In other words it does the same thing that a new recipient header would do. (Once the date separator reaches the top of the viewport, though, the header reappears — this time the one provided by the date separator, so it looks the same as the old recipient header except for its date.)
But a date separator doesn't have all the information a recipient header does, so it doesn't replace the old recipient header and shouldn't push it off the screen. Instead, it should behave the same as a message, and let the preceding item's sticky header overlap into it.
This is a sort of followup to #173 / #469, where we introduced date separators in the first place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: