Skip to content

[TASK] Mark the shorthand expansion as to be removed earlier #714

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2024

Conversation

oliverklee
Copy link
Contributor

This will allow us to get rid of the code earlier, which will reduce code complexity and make maintenance easier.

I will backport those deprecations to 8.x.

This will allow us to get rid of the code earlier, which will reduce
code complexity and make maintenance easier.

I will backport those deprecations to 8.x.
Copy link
Contributor

@JakeQZ JakeQZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine given there will be an 8.7 release.

@JakeQZ JakeQZ merged commit b6f57b9 into main Sep 8, 2024
21 checks passed
@JakeQZ JakeQZ deleted the task/remove-expansion-earlier branch September 8, 2024 15:25
oliverklee added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
This is the backport of #714 and the tickets leading up to that:
- #578
- #580
- #579
- #577
- #576
- #575
- #574
- #573
- #572
- #571
- #570
- #569
- #566
- #567
- #558
oliverklee added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
This is the backport of #714 and all those changes:

- #578
- #580
- #579
- #577
- #576
- #575
- #574
- #573
- #572
- #571
- #570
- #569
- #566
- #567
- #558
JakeQZ pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
This is the backport of #714 and all those changes:

- #578
- #580
- #579
- #577
- #576
- #575
- #574
- #573
- #572
- #571
- #570
- #569
- #566
- #567
- #558
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants