Skip to content

Update boundingbox_camera.md with the proper projection matrix#552

Merged
ahcorde merged 1 commit intogazebosim:gz-sensors10from
jmackay2:patch-1
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

Update boundingbox_camera.md with the proper projection matrix#552
ahcorde merged 1 commit intogazebosim:gz-sensors10from
jmackay2:patch-1

Conversation

@jmackay2
Copy link
Contributor

🦟 Bug fix

Summary

The projection matrix assumed a horizontal fov of 1.57, when all of the rest of the example uses a horizontal fov of 1.047. This matches the projection matrix to the rest of the example so the python code works correctly without modification.

Before:
image3d

After:
image3d_corrected

This is just an update to a tutorial, so testing was done primarily by following the tutorial.

Checklist

  • Signed all commits for DCO
  • Updated documentation (as needed)

Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining Signed-off-by and Generated-by messages.

The projection matrix assumed a horizontal fov of 1.57, when all of the rest of the example uses a horizontal fov of 1.047. This matches the projection matrix to the rest of the example so the python code works correctly without modification. 

Signed-off-by: jmackay2 <1.732mackay@gmail.com>
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Inbox to In review in Core development Aug 28, 2025
@ahcorde ahcorde merged commit 909cb35 into gazebosim:gz-sensors10 Aug 28, 2025
14 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In review to Done in Core development Aug 28, 2025
@iche033 iche033 mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2025
7 tasks
iche033 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
The projection matrix assumed a horizontal fov of 1.57, when all of the rest of the example uses a horizontal fov of 1.047. This matches the projection matrix to the rest of the example so the python code works correctly without modification.

Signed-off-by: jmackay2 <1.732mackay@gmail.com>
iche033 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
The projection matrix assumed a horizontal fov of 1.57, when all of the rest of the example uses a horizontal fov of 1.047. This matches the projection matrix to the rest of the example so the python code works correctly without modification.

Signed-off-by: jmackay2 <1.732mackay@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🪵 jetty Gazebo Jetty

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants