Skip to content

Fix cudacodec so that it can use streams other than the default #2999

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2021

Conversation

cudawarped
Copy link
Contributor

@cudawarped cudawarped commented Jul 8, 2021

Currently if a CUDA stream is passed to
cv::cudacodec::nextFrame(GpuMat& frame, Stream &stream);
the mapping (cuvidMapVideoFrame) of a video frame to CUDA from the hardware decoder uses the default instead of the provided stream.

This tiny fix ensures the provided stream is passed to cuvidMapVideoFrame().

Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or other license that is incompatible with OpenCV
  • The PR is proposed to proper branch
  • There is reference to original bug report and related work
  • There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
    Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
  • The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
force_builders=Custom
buildworker:Custom=linux-4,linux-6
build_image:Custom=ubuntu-cuda:18.04

…d mapping (cuvidMapVideoFrame) of a video frame to cuda from the hardware decoder can use streams other than the default.
Copy link
Member

@alalek alalek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for contribution 👍

@alalek alalek merged commit 2c5a777 into opencv:master Jul 9, 2021
@alalek alalek mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants