Test most of //runtime in unittest-buck #8713
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
swolchok
requested review from
dbort,
JacobSzwejbka and
lucylq
as code owners
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8713
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 4 New FailuresAs of commit a088f9f with merge base e6d44fa ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
This was referenced Feb 26, 2025
swolchok
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2025
Ended up having to skip //runtime/test/..., which means some previous PRs aren't strictly necessary, so don't feel obliged to accept them all. ghstack-source-id: ff9fb1c9ea8f6652db98c81981341a005be86515 ghstack-comment-id: 2683602764 Pull Request resolved: #8713
swolchok
changed the title
|
ping reviewers @dbort @JacobSzwejbka @lucylq |
swolchok
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2025
Ended up having to skip //runtime/test/..., which means some previous PRs aren't strictly necessary, so don't feel obliged to accept them all. ghstack-source-id: 1d0cf52bedcc72bda9a8121c81a741358fd350fb ghstack-comment-id: 2683602764 Pull Request resolved: #8713
swolchok
added
the
release notes: build
swolchok
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2025
Ended up having to skip //runtime/test/..., which means some previous PRs aren't strictly necessary, so don't feel obliged to accept them all. ghstack-source-id: 184a255036c398dd05e5f8b80b55c0e56586a304 ghstack-comment-id: 2683602764 Pull Request resolved: #8713
swolchok
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2025
Ended up having to skip //runtime/test/..., which means some previous PRs aren't strictly necessary, so don't feel obliged to accept them all. ghstack-source-id: 5b1c79b7fbdec1852defe94652176f701a666682 ghstack-comment-id: 2683602764 Pull Request resolved: #8713
This was referenced Mar 7, 2025
swolchok
requested review from
larryliu0820,
kirklandsign,
jackzhxng,
iseeyuan,
tarun292,
cccclai,
Gasoonjia,
digantdesai,
mcr229 and
SS-JIA
as code owners
|
@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
|
@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ended up having to skip
//runtime/test/..., which means some previous PRs aren't strictly necessary, so don't feel obliged to accept them all.Differential Revision: D70791341