Skip to content

Remove flat relicts - part 2 #151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 23, 2017

Conversation

lorenzwalthert
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #121. As noted in #121 (comment), code in vignettes that is now out-dated was replaced with rendered md before the respective code was removed.

Copy link
Member

@krlmlr krlmlr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was easy to review ;-) Maybe explicitly mention in the vignettes that the content is outdated, and perhaps move them to a subdirectory?

@lorenzwalthert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ok, yes right we wanted to mention it. What should the sub-directory be called then? I think old is a bad name... Since they were related to my initial GSOC Application, we could just call it gsoc_proposal?

@krlmlr
Copy link
Member

krlmlr commented Aug 23, 2017

Sounds good.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #151 into master will increase coverage by 7.82%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #151      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.86%   93.68%   +7.82%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines         778      713      -65     
==========================================
  Hits          668      668              
+ Misses        110       45      -65
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/parsed.R 93.75% <ø> (+60.41%) ⬆️
R/visit.R 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
R/utils.R 100% <ø> (+20%) ⬆️
R/serialize.R 100% <ø> (+76.08%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5868c21...a9e7146. Read the comment docs.

Update where easily possible, mark as outdated otherwise.
@lorenzwalthert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Getting up to 93% coverage 😄. I think we should add a coverage badge to the README haha.

@lorenzwalthert lorenzwalthert merged commit 26075af into r-lib:master Aug 23, 2017
krlmlr added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2017
- Vignette on customizing styler (#145).
- No line break after `switch()` and friends (#152).
- Remove flat relicts completely (#151).
- Don't reindent function calls and break line correctly for multi-line calls (#149).
- Set space between "=" and "," (#150).
- Make R CMD Check perfect (#148).
- Adding tests for exception handling with invalid parse data (#139).
- Fix indention by checking for all potential triggers (#142).
- Fix un-indention (#135).
- Support wide characters (#130).
- No spaces around :, :: and :::.
- Redesigning the API (#123).
- Solve eq_sub indention in general (#125).
- Minor refactorings.
- Re-indent token-dependent (#119).
- Supporting more indention patterns.
- Allow raw indention.
- Definitively fixing eol issue with comments.
- Infrastructure.
- Flattening out the parse table.
- New rule: no space after ! -> !!! for tidyeval.
- Fix spacing around '{'.
- Don't drop tokens! Fixes #101.
- EOL spaces in empty comments (and in general) (#98).
- mal-indention in conditional statement due to wrong specification of indent_without_paren) (#95).
- Complicated indentions based on arithmetic and special operators (#96).
- indention interaction on with assignment operator and other operators (#97).
@lorenzwalthert lorenzwalthert deleted the rm_flat_relicts branch September 17, 2017 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants