Skip to content

AMDGPU stepthomas atomic csub no rtn forms ver2 - #1

Closed
stepthomas wants to merge 467 commits into
mainfrom
AMDGPU-stepthomas-atomic-csub-no-rtn-forms-ver2
Closed

AMDGPU stepthomas atomic csub no rtn forms ver2#1
stepthomas wants to merge 467 commits into
mainfrom
AMDGPU-stepthomas-atomic-csub-no-rtn-forms-ver2

Conversation

@stepthomas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

philnik777 and others added 30 commits October 6, 2023 11:21
…ability macros

Adding additional instantiations to the dylib isn't actually an ABI break as long as programs targeting an older dylib don't start to depend on them. Making additional instantiations a matter of availability allows us to add them without an ABI break.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Mordante

Spies: arichardson, ldionne, Mordante, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154796
- Add test coverage for sext/zext boolean additions
- [InstCombine] Fold comparison of adding two z/sext booleans

Fixes llvm#64859.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Spies: ldionne, Mordante, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155411
…stinations (llvm#68074)

Extend `bufferization.materialize_in_destination` to support memref
destinations. This op can now be used to indicate that a tensor
computation should materialize in a given buffer (that may have been
allocated by another component/runtime). The op still participates in
"empty tensor elimination".

Example:
```mlir
func.func @test(%out: memref<10xf32>) {
  %t = tensor.empty() : tensor<10xf32>
  %c = linalg.generic ... outs(%t: tensor<10xf32>) -> tensor<10xf32>
  bufferization.materialize_in_destination %c in restrict writable %out : (tensor<10xf32>, memref<10xf32>) -> ()
  return
}
```
After "empty tensor elimination", the above IR can bufferize without an
allocation:
```mlir
func.func @test(%out: memref<10xf32>) {
  linalg.generic ... outs(%out: memref<10xf32>)
  return
}
```

This change also clarifies the meaning of the `restrict` unit attribute
on `bufferization.to_tensor` ops.
Some large AVR programs (for devices without long jump) may exceed
128KiB, and lld should give explicit errors other than generate wrong
executables silently.
…mber detection (llvm#68405)

Fixes misleading comment introduced in
`f74aaca63202cabb512c78fe19196ff348d436a8`
…llvm#67120)

The transfrom interpreter accepts an argument to a "library" file with
named sequences. This patch exteneds this functionality such that (1)
several such individual files are accepted and (2) folders can be passed
in, in which all `*.mlir` files are loaded.
…ffles

Allow length changing shuffle masks in the "bitcast (shuf V, MaskC) --> shuf (bitcast V), MaskC'" fold.

It also exposes some poor shuffle mask detection for extract/insert subvector cases inside improveShuffleKindFromMask

First stage towards addressing Issue llvm#67803
This patch tries to canonicalise add + gep to gep + gep.

Co-authored-by: Paul Walker <paul.walker@arm.com>

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155688
…erErrors member variable correctly based on the PP diagnostics. (llvm#68127)""

This reverts commit a6acf3f and
relands a50e63b. The original revert
was done by mistake.
…8382)

While working on llvm#68377 inspecting `Allocate()` calls, I found out that
there are couple of places where we forget to use placement-new to
create objects in the allocated memory.
/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h:948:33: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
          (Index + Mask.size()) <= NumSrcElts) {
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  ^  ~~~~~~~~~~
…ing a simple transform dialect interpreter pass (llvm#68330)
These were missed as I didn't expect clang codegen to be updated
…lvm#65852)

This patch folds the pattern `a ne/eq (zext/sext (a ne/eq c))` into a boolean constant or a compare.
Clang vs GCC: https://godbolt.org/z/4ro817WE8
Proof for `zext`: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/6z9NRF
Proof for `sext`: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/tv5wuE
Fixes llvm#65073.
Introduced by 5b657f5 that moved
LICM after AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare. Some instructions are no longer
sunk during ir optimizations but in machine-sinking instead.
If vgpr instruction used sgpr defined inside the cycle is sunk outside
of the cycle we end up with not-handled case of temporal divergence.
Add test for theoretical case when SALU instruction (represents
uniform value) is sunk outside of the cycle.
Add a test when SALU instruction can be sunk if it edits lane mask.
Temporal divergence that was present in input or introduced in IR
transforms, like code-sinking or LICM, is handled in SIFixSGPRCopies
by changing sgpr source instr to vgpr instr.
After 5b657f5, that moved LICM after AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare,
machine-sinking can introduce temporal divergence by sinking
instructions outside of the cycle.
Add isSafeToSink callback in TargetInstrInfo.
LiqinWeng and others added 21 commits October 10, 2023 11:39
…vm#68578)

Fixes llvm#68481, In the following scenario, the conversion fails:
1. resultType of tosa.slice is UnrankedTensorType
2. tosa.slice.getsize().size() < resultType.getRank()
This restores the pre-b9383a86b8f behavior. Most platforms / compilers don't
add relocations for CIEs, however they're not prohibited and we want objects
that contain them to remain loadable.
llvm#68320)

This function has several overloads that allow to specify the symbol
that should be renamed and the scope for that renaming in different
ways. The overloads were inconsistent in the following way (quoted
strings are `StringAttr`s, other variables are `Operation *`):

* `replaceAllSymbolUses(symbolOp, "new_symbol", scopeOp)` would traverse
into the nested regions of `scopeOp` and hence rename the symbol inside
of `scopeOp`.
* `replaceAllSymbolUses("symbol", "new_symbol", scopeOp)` would *not*
traverse into the nested regions of `scopeOp` and hence *not* rename the
symbol.

The underlying behavior was spread over different places and is somewhat
hard to understand. The two overloads above mainly differed by what
`collectSymbolScopes` computed, which is itself overloaded. If `scopeOp`
is a top-level module, then the overload on `(Operation *, Operation
*)`, which is used in the first of the above cases, computes a scope
where the body region of the module is the `limit`; however, the
overload on `(StringAttr, Operation *)` computed the module op itself as
the `limit`. Later, `walkSymbolTable` would walk the body of the module
if it was given as a region but it would *not* enter the regions of the
module op because that op has a symbol table (which was assumed to be a
*different* scope).

The fix in this commit is change the behavior of `collectSymbolScopes`
such that the `(StringAttr, Operation *)` overload returns a scope for
each region in the `limit` argument.
The -fsanitize=alignment implementation follows the model that we allow
forming unaligned pointers but disallow accessing unaligned pointers.
See [RFC: Enforcing pointer type alignment in Clang](https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/094012.html)
for detail.

memcpy is a memory access and we require an `int *` argument to be aligned.
Similar to https://reviews.llvm.org/D9673 , emit -fsanitize=alignment check for
arguments of builtin memcpy and memmove functions to catch misaligned load like:
```
// Check the alignment of a but ignore the alignment of b
void unaligned_load(int *a, void *b) { memcpy(a, b, sizeof(*a)); }
```

For a reference parameter, we emit a -fsanitize=alignment check as well, which
can be optimized out by InstCombinePass. We rely on the call site
`TCK_ReferenceBinding` check instead.
```
// The alignment check of a will be optimized out.
void unaligned_load(int &a, void *b) { memcpy(&a, b, sizeof(a)); }
```

The diagnostic message looks like
```
runtime error: store to misaligned address [[PTR:0x[0-9a-f]*]] for type 'int *'
```

We could use a better message for memcpy, but we don't do it for now as it would
require a new check name like misaligned-pointer-use, which is probably not
necessary. *RFC: Enforcing pointer type alignment in Clang* is not well documented,
but this patch does not intend to change the that.

Technically builtin memset functions can be checked for -fsanitize=alignment as
well, but it does not seem too useful.
1. The generated file contained a lot of duplicate switch cases, e.g.:
```
switch (Syntax) {
case AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax::AS_GNU:
  return llvm::StringSwitch<int>(Name)
...
    .Case("error", 1)
    .Case("warning", 1)
    .Case("error", 1)
    .Case("warning", 1)
```

2. Some attributes were listed in wrong places, e.g.:
```
case AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax::AS_CXX11: {
if (ScopeName == "") {
  return llvm::StringSwitch<int>(Name)
...
    .Case("warn_unused_result", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11 ? 201907 : 0)
```

`warn_unused_result` is a non-standard attribute and should not be
available as [[warn_unused_result]].

3. Some attributes had the wrong version, e.g.:
```
case AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax::AS_CXX11: {
} else if (ScopeName == "gnu") {
  return llvm::StringSwitch<int>(Name)
...
    .Case("fallthrough", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11 ? 201603 : 0)
```

[[gnu::fallthrough]] is a non-standard spelling and should not have the
standard version. Instead, __has_cpp_attribute should return 1 for it.

There is another issue with attributes that share spellings, e.g.:
```
    .Case("interrupt", true && (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::arm || ...) ? 1 : 0)
    .Case("interrupt", true && (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::avr) ? 1 : 0)
...
    .Case("interrupt", true && (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::riscv32 || ...) ? 1 : 0)
```
As can be seen, __has_attribute(interrupt) would only return true for
ARM targets. This patch does not address this issue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159393
…tof` (llvm#65246)

Fixes llvm#64619

Clang warns diagnostic for non-standard layout types in `offsetof` only
if they are in evaluated context. With this patch, you'll also get
diagnostic if you use `offsetof` on non-standard layout types in any
other contexts
… on downstream projects that may define additional opcodes.
I would put this into the implementation of verify for tosa.slice
…68571)

On MinGW targets, the .ctors section is always used for constructors.

When using the .ctors section, the constructors need to be emitted in
reverse order to get them execute in the right order. (Constructors with
a specific priority are sorted separately by the linker later.) In LLVM,
in CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp, there's code that reverses them
before writing them out, executed when using the .ctors section. This
logic is done whenever TM.Options.UseInitArray is set to false. Thus,
make sure to set UseInitArray to false for this target.

This fixes llvm#55938.
…vm#68287)

A number of useful constants can be encoded with a 64-bit ORR followed
by a 64-bit EOR, including all remaining repeated byte patterns, some
useful repeated 16-bit patterns, and some irregular masks. This patch
prioritizes that encoding over three or four instruction encodings.
Encoding with MOV + MOVK or ORR + MOVK is still preferred for fast
literal generation and readability respectively.

The method devises three candidate values, and checks if both Candidate
and (Imm ^ Candidate) are valid logical immediates. If so, Imm is
materialized with:

```
ORR Xd, XZR, #(Imm ^ Candidate)
EOR Xd, Xd, #(Candidate)
```

The method has been exhaustively tested to ensure it can solve all
possible values (excluding 0, ~0, and plain logical immediates, which
are handled earlier).
)

This allows tooling to properly show diffs for files in the
llvm/test/tools/llvm-rc/Inputs directory.

Keep the actual icon/cursor/bitmap files marked as binary.
llvm#67791)

The primary ISA-independent justification for using PC-relative
addressing is that it makes code position-independent and therefore
allows sharing of .text pages between processes.

When not sharing .text pages, we can use absolute relocations instead,
which will possibly prevent a bubble introduced by s_getpc_b64.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Symalla <thomas.symalla@amd.com>
llvm#68646)

Fixes:llvm#68542
It‘s meaningless to diagnose further error for invalid function
declaration.
Similar to D159254, this fixes the order of WriteAdr operands on post/pre-inc
loads/stores in the Cortex-A510 scheduling model.

I will add the same for other models too, this will be the most impactful due
to it being the default cpu scheduling model.

Closes llvm#68518
When converting to ConstantRange, we should treat undef like a full range.
Fixes llvm#68381.
These will be used in future pass to ensure that loads/stores of masks
are legal (as the LLVM backend does not support this for any type
smaller
than an svbool, which is vector<[16]xi1>).

Depends on llvm#68399
…C_CSUB instructions

The BUFFER_ATOMIC_CSUB and GLOBAL_ATOMIC_CSUB instructions have encodings for
non-value-returning forms, although actually using them isn't supported by
hardware. However, these encodings aren't supported by the backend, meaning
that they can't even be assembled or disassembled.

Add support for the non-returning encodings, but gate actually using them
in instruction selection behind a new feature FeatureAtomicCSubNoRtnInsts,
which no target uses. This does allow the non-returning instructions to be
tested manually and llvm.amdgcn.atomic.csub.ll is extended to cover them.
The feature does not gate assembling or disassembling them, this is now
not an error, and encoding and decoding tests have been adapted accordingly.
stepthomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
This reverts commit a1e81d2.

Revert "Fix test hip-offload-compress-zlib.hip"

This reverts commit ba01ce6.

Revert due to sanity fail at

https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/37188

https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/238/builds/5955

/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Driver/OffloadBundler.cpp:1012:25: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0xaaaae2d90e7c for type 'const uint64_t' (aka 'const unsigned long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0xaaaae2d90e7c: note: pointer points here
  bc 00 00 00 94 dc 29 9a  89 fb ca 2b 78 9c 8b 8f  77 f6 71 f4 73 8f f7 77  73 f3 f1 77 74 89 77 0a
              ^
    #0 0xaaaaba125f70 in clang::CompressedOffloadBundle::decompress(llvm::MemoryBuffer const&, bool) /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Driver/OffloadBundler.cpp:1012:25
    #1 0xaaaaba126150 in clang::OffloadBundler::ListBundleIDsInFile(llvm::StringRef, clang::OffloadBundlerConfig const&) /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Driver/OffloadBundler.cpp:1089:7

Will reland after fixing it.
@stepthomas stepthomas closed this Oct 10, 2023
@stepthomas
stepthomas deleted the AMDGPU-stepthomas-atomic-csub-no-rtn-forms-ver2 branch October 10, 2023 09:46
@stepthomas
stepthomas restored the AMDGPU-stepthomas-atomic-csub-no-rtn-forms-ver2 branch October 10, 2023 10:33
stepthomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2025
## Summary

Fix `FindProcesses` to respect Android's `hidepid=2` security model and
enable name matching for Android apps.

## Problem

1. Called `adb shell pidof` or `adb shell ps` directly, bypassing
Android's process visibility restrictions
2. Name matching failed for Android apps - searched for
`com.example.myapp` but GDB Remote Protocol reports `app_process64`

Android apps fork from Zygote, so `/proc/PID/exe` points to
`app_process64` for all apps. The actual package name is only in
`/proc/PID/cmdline`. The previous implementation applied name filters
without supplementing with cmdline, so searches failed.

## Fix

- Delegate to lldb-server via GDB Remote Protocol (respects `hidepid=2`)
- Get all visible processes, supplement zygote/app_process entries with
cmdline, then apply name matching
- Only fetch cmdline for zygote apps (performance), parallelize with
`xargs -P 8`
- Remove redundant code (GDB Remote Protocol already provides GID/arch)

## Test Results

### Before this fix:

```
(lldb) platform process list
error: no processes were found on the "remote-android" platform

(lldb) platform process list -n com.example.hellojni
1 matching process was found on "remote-android"
PID    PARENT USER       TRIPLE                         NAME
====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================
5276   359    u0_a192                                   com.example.hellojni
                         ^^^^^^^^ Missing triple!
```

### After this fix:

```
(lldb) platform process list
PID    PARENT USER       TRIPLE                         NAME
====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================
1      0      root       aarch64-unknown-linux-android  init
2      0      root                                      [kthreadd]
359    1      system     aarch64-unknown-linux-android  app_process64
5276   359    u0_a192    aarch64-unknown-linux-android  com.example.hellojni
5357   5355   u0_a192    aarch64-unknown-linux-android  sh
5377   5370   u0_a192    aarch64-unknown-linux-android  lldb-server
                          ^^^^^^^^ User-space processes now have triples!

(lldb) platform process list -n com.example.hellojni
1 matching process was found on "remote-android"
PID    PARENT USER       TRIPLE                         NAME
====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================
5276   359    u0_a192    aarch64-unknown-linux-android  com.example.hellojni


(lldb) process attach -n com.example.hellojni
Process 5276 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'example.hellojni', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP
```

## Test Plan

With an Android device/emulator connected:

1. Start lldb-server on device:
```bash
adb push lldb-server /data/local/tmp/
adb shell chmod +x /data/local/tmp/lldb-server
adb shell /data/local/tmp/lldb-server platform  --listen 127.0.0.1:9500 --server
```

2. Connect from LLDB:
```
(lldb) platform select remote-android
(lldb) platform connect connect://127.0.0.1:9500
(lldb) platform process list
```

3. Verify:
- `platform process list` returns all processes with triple information
- `platform process list -n com.example.app` finds Android apps by
package name
- `process attach -n com.example.app` successfully attaches to Android
apps

## Impact

Restores `platform process list` on Android with architecture
information and package name lookup. All name matching modes now work
correctly.

Fixes llvm#164192
stepthomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2025
…am (llvm#167724)

This got exposed by `09262656f32ab3f2e1d82e5342ba37eecac52522`.

The underlying stream of `m_os` is referenced by the `TextDiagnostic`
member of `TextDiagnosticPrinter`. It got turned into a
`llvm::formatted_raw_ostream` in the commit above. When
`~TextDiagnosticPrinter` (and thus `~TextDiagnostic`) is invoked, we now
call `~formatted_raw_ostream`, which tries to access the underlying
stream. But `m_os` was already deleted because it is earlier in the
order of destruction in `TextDiagnosticPrinter`. Move the `m_os` member
before the `TextDiagnosticPrinter` to avoid a use-after-free.

Drive-by:
* Also move the `m_output` member which the `m_os` holds a reference to.
The fact it's a reference indicates the expectation is most likely that
the string outlives the stream.

The ASAN macOS bot is currently failing with this:
```
08:15:39  =================================================================
08:15:39  ==61103==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60600012cf40 at pc 0x00012140d304 bp 0x00016eecc850 sp 0x00016eecc848
08:15:39  READ of size 8 at 0x60600012cf40 thread T0
08:15:39      #0 0x00012140d300 in llvm::formatted_raw_ostream::releaseStream() FormattedStream.h:205
08:15:39      #1 0x00012140d3a4 in llvm::formatted_raw_ostream::~formatted_raw_ostream() FormattedStream.h:145
08:15:39      llvm#2 0x00012604abf8 in clang::TextDiagnostic::~TextDiagnostic() TextDiagnostic.cpp:721
08:15:39      llvm#3 0x00012605dc80 in clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter::~TextDiagnosticPrinter() TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp:30
08:15:39      llvm#4 0x00012605dd5c in clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter::~TextDiagnosticPrinter() TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp:27
08:15:39      llvm#5 0x0001231fb210 in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47
08:15:39      llvm#6 0x0001231fb3bc in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47
08:15:39      llvm#7 0x000129aa9d70 in clang::DiagnosticsEngine::~DiagnosticsEngine() Diagnostic.cpp:91
08:15:39      llvm#8 0x0001230436b8 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::DiagnosticsEngine>::Release() const IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:103
08:15:39      llvm#9 0x0001231fe6c8 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93
08:15:39      llvm#10 0x0001231fe858 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93
...
08:15:39
08:15:39  0x60600012cf40 is located 32 bytes inside of 56-byte region [0x60600012cf20,0x60600012cf58)
08:15:39  freed by thread T0 here:
08:15:39      #0 0x0001018abb88 in _ZdlPv+0x74 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x4bb88)
08:15:39      #1 0x0001231fb1c0 in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47
08:15:39      llvm#2 0x0001231fb3bc in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47
08:15:39      llvm#3 0x000129aa9d70 in clang::DiagnosticsEngine::~DiagnosticsEngine() Diagnostic.cpp:91
08:15:39      llvm#4 0x0001230436b8 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::DiagnosticsEngine>::Release() const IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:103
08:15:39      llvm#5 0x0001231fe6c8 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93
08:15:39      llvm#6 0x0001231fe858 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93
...
08:15:39
08:15:39  previously allocated by thread T0 here:
08:15:39      #0 0x0001018ab760 in _Znwm+0x74 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x4b760)
08:15:39      #1 0x0001231f8dec in lldb_private::ClangModulesDeclVendor::Create(lldb_private::Target&) ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:732
08:15:39      llvm#2 0x00012320af58 in lldb_private::ClangPersistentVariables::GetClangModulesDeclVendor() ClangPersistentVariables.cpp:124
08:15:39      llvm#3 0x0001232111f0 in lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::PrepareForParsing(lldb_private::DiagnosticManager&, lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, bool) ClangUserExpression.cpp:536
08:15:39      llvm#4 0x000123213790 in lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse(lldb_private::DiagnosticManager&, lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, lldb_private::ExecutionPolicy, bool, bool) ClangUserExpression.cpp:647
08:15:39      llvm#5 0x00012032b258 in lldb_private::UserExpression::Evaluate(lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ValueObject>&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>*, lldb_private::ValueObject*) UserExpression.cpp:280
08:15:39      llvm#6 0x000120724010 in lldb_private::Target::EvaluateExpression(llvm::StringRef, lldb_private::ExecutionContextScope*, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ValueObject>&, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>*, lldb_private::ValueObject*) Target.cpp:2905
08:15:39      llvm#7 0x00011fc7bde0 in lldb::SBTarget::EvaluateExpression(char const*, lldb::SBExpressionOptions const&) SBTarget.cpp:2305
08:15:39  ==61103==ABORTING
...
```
stepthomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2025
stepthomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
llvm#168619)

I've been working on some scripts that evaluate the parent and child
frame. It's been very annoying that the parent frame has a property but
not the child. So I've added this to the extensions, I would've
preferred to return None, but because the existing impl returns an
invalid SBFrame, so I'm conforming to that API.

```
(lldb) script
Python Interactive Interpreter. To exit, type 'quit()', 'exit()' or Ctrl-D.
>>> lldb.frame
frame #0: 0x0000555555555200 fib.out`main
>>> lldb.frame.parent
frame #1: 0x00007ffff782a610 libc.so.6`__libc_start_call_main + 128
>>> lldb.frame.parent.child
frame #0: 0x0000555555555200 fib.out`main
```
stepthomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
… errors (llvm#169989)

We can see the following while running clang-repl in C mode 
```
anutosh491@vv-nuc:/build/anutosh491/llvm-project/build/bin$ ./clang-repl --Xcc=-x --Xcc=c --Xcc=-std=c23
clang-repl> printf("hi\n");
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_1:1:1: error: call to undeclared library function 'printf' with type 'int (const char *, ...)'; ISO C99 and
      later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1 | printf("hi\n");
      | ^
input_line_1:1:1: note: include the header <stdio.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'printf'
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> #include <stdio.h>
hi
```

In debug mode while dumping the generated Module, i see this 
```
clang-repl> printf("hi\n");
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_1:1:1: error: call to undeclared library function 'printf' with type 'int (const char *, ...)'; ISO C99 and
      later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1 | printf("hi\n");
      | ^
input_line_1:1:1: note: include the header <stdio.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'printf'
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> #include <stdio.h>

=== compile-ptu 1 ===
[TU=0x55556cfbf830, M=0x55556cfc13a0 (incr_module_1)]
[LLVM IR]
; ModuleID = 'incr_module_1'
source_filename = "incr_module_1"
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"

@.str = private unnamed_addr constant [4 x i8] c"hi\0A\00", align 1
@llvm.global_ctors = appending global [1 x { i32, ptr, ptr }] [{ i32, ptr, ptr } { i32 65535, ptr @_GLOBAL__sub_I_incr_module_1, ptr null }]

define internal void @__stmts__0() #0 {
entry:
  %call = call i32 (ptr, ...) @printf(ptr noundef @.str)
  ret void
}

declare i32 @printf(ptr noundef, ...) #1

; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
define internal void @_GLOBAL__sub_I_incr_module_1() llvm#2 section ".text.startup" {
entry:
  call void @__stmts__0()
  ret void
}

attributes #0 = { "min-legal-vector-width"="0" }
attributes #1 = { "frame-pointer"="all" "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+cmov,+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87" "tune-cpu"="generic" }
attributes llvm#2 = { noinline nounwind uwtable "frame-pointer"="all" "min-legal-vector-width"="0" "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+cmov,+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87" "tune-cpu"="generic" }

!llvm.module.flags = !{!0, !1, !2, !3, !4}
!llvm.ident = !{!5}

!0 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4}
!1 = !{i32 8, !"PIC Level", i32 2}
!2 = !{i32 7, !"PIE Level", i32 2}
!3 = !{i32 7, !"uwtable", i32 2}
!4 = !{i32 7, !"frame-pointer", i32 2}
!5 = !{!"clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/anutosh491/llvm-project.git 81ad8fb)"}
=== end compile-ptu ===

execute-ptu 1: [TU=0x55556cfbf830, M=0x55556cfc13a0 (incr_module_1)]
hi
```

Basically I see that CodeGen emits IR for a cell before we know whether
DiagnosticsEngine has an error. For C code like `printf("hi\n");`
without <stdio.h>, Sema emits a diagnostic but still produces a
"codegen-able" `TopLevelStmt`, so the `printf` call is IR-generated into
the current module.

Previously, when `Diags.hasErrorOccurred()` was true, we only cleaned up
the PTU AST and left the CodeGen module untouched. The next successful
cell then called `GenModule()`, which returned that same module (now
also containing the next cell’s IR), causing side effects from the
failed cell (e.g. printf)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clang::ASTWriter can create a crashing PCH if an incorrect hasErrors value is passed