Skip to content

refac(ci): improve build time #123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2019
Merged

Conversation

juancarlostong
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Optimizations to the 'Integration tests' triggering build:

  • added merge_mode: replace, trigger job only needs to run shell script, so just do that and nothing else.
  • added cache: false, caching is used for some *-sdk, this disables it for the 'Integration tests' triggering build since it is not needed.
  • replaced after_success: skip with after_success: travis_terminate 0, this avoids running srcclr which saves 18-30s from build time.

@juancarlostong juancarlostong force-pushed the jctong/improve_build_time branch from 8b0b1e9 to c3c7cfa Compare January 2, 2019 20:01
@juancarlostong juancarlostong force-pushed the jctong/improve_build_time branch from 54f09d4 to 746c97f Compare January 2, 2019 20:37
@juancarlostong juancarlostong removed the bug label Jan 2, 2019
@juancarlostong juancarlostong force-pushed the jctong/improve_build_time branch 3 times, most recently from 3f425d3 to dd77266 Compare January 2, 2019 21:34
also added testing of mono: 5.18.0 in order to force travis to run
unit tests
Copy link
Contributor

@msohailhussain msohailhussain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@msohailhussain msohailhussain mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2019
@juancarlostong juancarlostong mentioned this pull request May 27, 2020
This was referenced Aug 11, 2021
This was referenced Sep 7, 2021
This was referenced Mar 14, 2022
@mnoman09 mnoman09 mentioned this pull request May 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants